Monday, April 27, 2009

Flu who?

So it’s come to this: The deputy health minister in Israel says the term “swine flu” is offensive to Jews and Muslims.

Why? Well, because for devout members of both faiths, let’s just say that pork is not the other white meat.

And this guy even says the illness should be called the “Mexican flu” because that country has the worst outbreak so far.

Gosh, it seems that if he was going to whine about being offended, he could come up with a better name that that. I’m going to go waaaay out on a limb here and guess that folks in Mexico would not be overly thrilled with that label.

What we need here, obviously, is a politically correct term for this new affliction. I would suggest:

“The illness/ailment that may have originated in/near pigs, though we’re not sure and do not wish to stereotype members of the Porcine Community, or suggest that they are not as clean as cows or horses, or imply that animals which roll around in or eat icky things should be condemned for their lifestyle choice.”

... OK, maybe that is a little long.

3 comments:

Anne said...

How about the "upchucking, praying to the toilet god,head splitting open, joints on fire, 104.2 temp, dehydrated to paper,gotta get a wheelchair,somebody just shoot me and get this over with" flu. Would that cover it without offending the sensibilities of people who can't figure out how to enjoy a pork chop? Gotta agree with Galoshes WD40 on this.

Mack said...

Anne's diagnosis is bang-on!

Mack said...

C'n I have all the pigs when yer done wit'em. This aint the time of year for makin sausage, but hey, ya take what ya can get.

Sven the Viking in Hardin County